(no photo available for Glenn M. Heller).
Dear Glenn Heller & Rinaldo Del Gallo III,
Thank you for your respective responses.
Glenn Heller does not understand the meanings of the words: PERSECUTION & EXTRAPOLATION.
My mental health providers are like Glenn Heller in his misunderstanding that:
I am a persecuted man and my extrapolations from my persecuters' actions are justified.
I have rationally explained event after event after event where I have been persecuted by top-down, powerbroker, opportunistic, conspiratorial, and the like, Pols and other bullies in my life.
I am seen by many as irrational, dark, self-righteous, harassing, threatening, violent, and a self-defeating person who believes he is always the victim in every situation, and on and on.
I guess that in Glenn Heller's, et al, views that I would satisfy every bully by proverbially "taking it up the ass." Well, bullies of the World, my response to all of you is a healthy and hearty: "FUCK YOU!" (Especially to Denis E. Guyer!)
I am not going to either figuratively or literally "take it up the ass"! I am going to survive, live and fight like hell to defend myself against all of the "ASSHOLES" out there who like to screw over good people like me.
If my emails scare you, Glenn Heller, then I will remove you from my list and not email you anymore. However, I do admire some of your good work in politcs, which is not to say you have my permission to bully me into agreeing with your beliefs. We live in a FREE COUNTRY where everyone has an opinion along with an asshole, and guess what? They both stink no matter who you are: Glenn M. Heller, Jonathan A. Melle, Alan Chartock, Mary Carey, Rinaldo Del Gallo III, Deval Patrick, John Kerry, Denis Guyer, Andy "Luciforo", Dan Bosley, Chris Speranzo, Chris Hodgkins, Peter Larkin, Jimmy Ruberto, Smitty Pignatelli, Stan Rosenberg, and every other "Son of a Bitch" and "Bitch" out living on our good Earth.
I will always speak my good conscience as long as I live. And just like everyone else out there, I will always poop, too. I have a right to do both just like everyone else.
The people who chose and still choose to bully me are all ASSHOLES! Chief among these bullying assholes is Denis E. Guyer and Andrea F. Nuciforo, Jr. They have persecuted me for many years of my adult life. I am proud that I have been able to stand up to them.
As for Rinaldo, he has been put in similar situations to me. Rinaldo was persecuted by Berkshire County District Attorney David F. Capeless and ultimately cleared and vindicated in state Court.
I am proud to call Rinaldo Del Gallo III my friend. I see Rinaldo like I see FDR and Winston Churchill contrasted to Adolf Hitler. FDR & Churchill had many human vices and flaws. FDR smoke and drank, had a mistress, and was NOT always "politically correct" on civil rights. Churchill started his day off at noon with an alcoholic drink, and had similar vices to FDR. Neither man exhibited model behavior. The man who had model behavior --started his day at dawn, never drank & smoked,...-- and grew his country's economy and military industrial complex was Hitler, who ultimately ended up to be a mass murderer and possibly the "Antichrist" of his time. The men who stopped Hitler were men with flaws and vices: FDR & Churchill.
Rinaldo Del Gallo III, like me, was persecuted for his petty personal and behavioral matters by men whose real character were those of PERSECUTORS like Hitler. I believe it is a fair EXTRAPOLATION for me to say that people who are "perfect" are really only PERSECUTORS like Adolf Hitler and other ASSHOLES who choose to bully instead of defend goodness. I believe someone like Rinaldo Del Gallo III would re-save the World from the next Hitler because someone like Rinaldo has the real character of goodness, not just a nice facade of "model behavior"!
Jonathan A. Melle
"Glenn M. Heller"
You are continually claiming that you have been harassed and threatened by various politicians over the years. Yet, it seems to me that you do the very same thing to those whom you consider your enemies. You certainly malign far more frequently than the few times you claim politicos have maligned you.
I cannot count the number of emails I have received from you stating how much you 'hate' this or that politician. Worse, the tone of your emails seems to me to have gotten considerably darker these past few months, so much so that you appear regularly to cross the line between protected speech and that which could be construed by reasonable people to be making threats by email and harassment by email, both of which are criminal offenses.
I don't have a problem with anyone intent on actual 'muck-raking'. If one is able to uncover information about politicians (or public figures) that helps to expose underhanded dealings or anything else about which the public should be aware, then I consider all that fair game.
But once you cross the line and make personal threats against your target or 'enemy', or you harass by sending emails purporting to be from your enemy, then not only do you do disservice to your cause (and to your own veracity), but you place yourself in legal jeopardy.
Glenn M. Heller, editor
February 14, 2008
Regarding Glenn Heller. Believe it or not, I just read this e-mail though it was sent a month ago, so I apologize for the belated response. Being in the public you constantly come across people that are unstable, angry, or feel they have right to pry into your personal and family life. From my recollection, my first e-mail with Mr. Heller indicated that he was angry. The subsequent e-mails indicated he is obviously not emotionally balanced.
Obviously, I am not going to personally defend my private family life in public discussion forums. I also think that sending someone a private e-mail, getting a response, and blasting it to numerous people says much about the type of person that this guy is.
I told him, as I have told countless others, that I have little interest in discussing my personal life with him and informed him that I would not respond to his futher e-mails. Any other stranger that started demanding questions about my personal life would get similar treatment.
I also question his intelligence. Here I am acquited of an obviously baseless charge, and there is a preoccupation with the fact that I lived with my parents. I know many single adults who live with their parents, and I know many married adults that live with their parents, wherein extended family unit remains at one domicile.
He did send me an e-mail, "So I asked him what does his lack of money have to do with imposing on his folks. I'm still waiting for a reply to that one." I have no idea why a complete stranger feels they have a right to e-mail me questions about my personal life and demand answers. Based on this, I assume that (1) he has serious mental health issues AND (2) he (or she) is clearly clueless as to what is appropriate and inappropriate conduct. He is quite correct, no reply will be forthcoming.
While I can't remember specifically what occurred, I remember an offensive e-mail, a one sentence reply, and then after he replied I sent him a polite letter indicating that I have no interest in conversting with him. I do not recollect what his e-mail address is. In my situation, I meet whack jobs on a continual basis. I simply step to the side and keep on going where I am going. I treat it like dog poop on the sidewalk. There are hundreds of Glenn Heller's I meet in my life.
I am interested in issues, rational debate (in a meaningfully public manner), and change. I'll take a raincheck on the other horse manure.